China+1 & Second Source Strategy

An Objective Feasibility Evaluation: India vs. China

We do not assume India is always the answer. Our mandate is to provide an empirical, evidence-backed evaluation — then govern the execution if India is commercially rational.

Every evaluation concludes with one of four clear verdicts: Stay, Dual-Source, Move, or Insufficient Data.

Request a China+1 Assessment
Evaluation Triggers

Key Drivers for a China+1 Feasibility Assessment

Your China supplier has increased prices by more than 15% over the past 24 months
Maritime lead times and port congestion have introduced production delays
Your product category is subject to US Section 301 tariffs (7.5% to 25%+) or European anti-dumping duties
A single factory in China produces more than 60% of your critical precision components
Customers or institutional investors require documented supply chain diversification
You are designing new tooling and want to establish India manufacturing from day one
Decision Framework

Four Structured Strategic Outcomes

Every feasibility dossier concludes with an evidence-backed determination and documented comparative metrics.

Stay

Remain in China

India cannot meaningfully compete for this specific component geometry, alloy, volume, or delivery window. Your existing China supplier remains the commercially rational choice.

Key Indicators
  • Ultra-tight micro-tolerances or exotic alloys with limited domestic India ingot supply
  • Very low annual volumes with disproportionate new tooling burden
  • Lead time requirements that maritime freight from India cannot satisfy
  • Delivered price differential is negligible after tariffs and shipping
GORVETA Action

GORVETA documents the empirical findings and advises against switching at this time.

Dual-Source

Risk Diversification

India is commercially viable and technologically capable. Establishing a qualified Indian second source mitigates single-country concentration risk without disrupting existing operations.

Key Indicators
  • India delivered landed cost is within 5–15% parity of China
  • Corporate supply chain mandate to reduce single-country dependency
  • Planned phased transition or buffer capacity for critical industrial lines
  • Exposure to Section 301 tariffs or potential trade sanctions
GORVETA Action

GORVETA qualifies 1–2 audited Indian suppliers, oversees sample approval, and supports phased volume allocation.

Move

Direct Transition

India provides a decisive commercial and strategic advantage across landed cost, quality, lead times, and tariff exemption. Full transition to India is the rational decision.

Key Indicators
  • India landed cost is 20%+ lower due to tariff differentials and domestic material integration
  • Indian suppliers demonstrate equal or superior precision and AS9100/PED certifications
  • High exposure to escalating 25%+ Section 301 tariffs on Chinese origin goods
  • Long-term commercial resilience requires non-China supply chain ownership
GORVETA Action

GORVETA executes end-to-end migration: supplier audit, tooling build, FAIR CMM approval, and serial production handover.

Insufficient Data

Further Discovery Required

Preliminary evidence suggests potential, but technical specifications or supplier market depth are insufficient to deliver a responsible recommendation.

Key Indicators
  • Niche proprietary process with few verified Indian manufacturers
  • Incomplete technical drawings or unspecified surface finish requirements
  • Highly volatile raw alloy specifications requiring custom metallurgical melts
  • Candidate suppliers require formal site visits before committing to commercial terms
GORVETA Action

GORVETA outlines the exact data gaps and recommends an exploratory technical audit before commercial commitment.

STRATEGY SIMULATOR

China+1 Second-Source Evaluation Framework

Toggle your operating constraints to see GORVETA's objective commercial recommendation.

Objective Decision Matrix
1. Primary Challenge
2. Tolerance Requirement
3. Annual Volume Tier
HIGH SAVINGS SCENARIO

Full Migration to Indian Manufacturer

The 25% Section 301 tariff penalty exceeds any production cost delta. Net delivered savings from India range from 18% to 32%.

Execution Guidance: Execute full CMM First Article Inspection and tooling pilot before transitioning serial production.

Our Commitment to Commercial Independence

We never push a transition if remaining with your current source is commercially optimal.
We earn zero commissions or rebates from Indian factories.
We normalize all quotes to delivered landed cost including duties and maritime freight.
We do not use synthetic estimates — all data is derived from audited factory quotations.
We disclose all tooling ownership and IP protection terms in writing.
A qualified human procurement engineer reviews every feasibility report.

Request an Independent China+1 Assessment

Select "China+1 / Second source" in our RFQ form and upload your technical specifications. We will deliver an initial feasibility verdict within 48 hours.

Request a China+1 Assessment